>Yes, but this editorial doesn't quite come out in favor of single-payor,
>does it?
They don't use the words - which is interesting, given their call for "liberals" to get bold on this - but they still come pretty close:
>And, into this vast, disturbing intellectual void on what is
>arguably the most important domestic issue of our time, the
>Democrats are proposing ... well, not a whole lot.
>It's time for the government to be much bolder, to try something
>even more far-reaching than what it attempted in the '60s: making
>health care a right, not a privilege. And doing so for everybody,
>even if that means having the government provide insurance directly.
>The historic solution to this problem was to insulate individuals
>from excessive risk. And, while the private sector once did this for
>health care, it's no longer up to the task. Government isn't the
>best way to provide all Americans with health security. It's the
>only way. And it's time for liberalism to say so openly.
Doug