May 14, 2006
Golfing and Gardening (and Working) in Retirement
By JULIE BICK
Turning 65, collecting a gold watch and hitting the golf course may be the classic picture of retirement.
But another model seems to be gaining acceptance, particularly among people now at or approaching retirement age. Call it flex-retirement. It involves reduced, but continuing, work combined with a cultivation of leisure activities sometimes beginning well before 65, and extending long past it. ...
A 2002 AARP study showed that 71 percent of workers age 45 to 56 plan to work into their retirement years. Thirty-five percent of that group planned to work part time for interest or enjoyment, 11 percent expected to start their own businesses, 7 percent planned to retire from their current jobs, but work full time at something else, and 18 percent planned to work part time mainly for the income.
There are, of course, broad social and economic reasons for the emphasis on continuing work notably, the decline in availability of traditional pension plans and health benefits, and the need for older workers to provide for themselves over a lengthening lifespan. Older working people often speak of the intangible benefits of work, including the opportunity to learn something new, to feel valued and to socialize with others. ...
Peter Cappelli, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania who studies work force management, said ... for people now approaching the traditional retirement age ... it makes sense to discuss options with employers [to create more options allowing them to continue working]. "Companies won't leap to make changes unless they have to," but with an aging work force, social pressures will surely mount. "There are so many baby boomers," he said, "that when they start to ask, companies will have to listen."
<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/business/yourmoney/14retire.html?_r=1&8dpc&oref=slogin>
Oddly, Prof. Cappelli ignores the fact that if boomers really did have clout, they never would have gotten into this mess to begin with because they'd still have defined-benefit pensions.
Carl