> To try to say it quickly, the investigative committee is
> unwarranted in
> reaching such a _definite_ conclusion that Churchill's conclusion
> is not
> supported by the evidence.
I think the point is that the sources he cited didn't say what he said they'd said, a problem he seems to have had more than once. Like I've said before, this is really sad & tragic, since the truth is terrible enough, and he's now indirectly discredited the truth.
Doug