[lbo-talk] Susie Bright on Foley etc

Dennis Claxton ddclaxton at earthlink.net
Tue Oct 3 15:26:59 PDT 2006



>
>It's so good to see someone pointing out that 16-year-olds aren't
>kids, too.
>
>Doug

Right. Apparently it's the age of consent in D.C.


>Section 30-103 of the D. C. Code defines the Age of Consent as 16.
>While that Section then goes on to apply that definition to
>marriage, the definition is clearly a more general one.
>
>That Section was enacted in 1901. Thus this is deeply embedded in
>Washington law, having been in effect for almost a century, and
>possibly reflecting older District law. It is nothing new or recent.
>
>The age of 16 is woven as a thread which pervades the entire body of
>D. C. law relating to sexual offenses of various kinds.

http://www.sodomylaws.org/usa/dc/dcdocuments04.htm



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list