[lbo-talk] Susie Bright on Foley etc

andie nachgeborenen andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 3 15:48:01 PDT 2006


Vis a vis 18 and maybe 20 year olds, 16 year olds aren't _entirely_ kids. (They are largely kids -- you will see, Doug!) Vis a vis 50 year olds, I think they are just plain kids. Lines are hard to draw but there's a difference between 16-18 year olds and 12-13 year olds and younger. It's futile to expect teens not to boff each other, and absurd to make it a crime (I had one girlfriend in HS with whom part of our entertainment was counting up the statutes we were violating, not being lawyers we probbaly got it wrong) but it's not futile to expect grownups to not to squeeze the Charmin -- if you are over 21, make passes at people 18 or over, please. The older the grownup, the worse the, uh, indiscretion. Morally speaking.As I say, the severe criminal penalties we impose on sex with minors seem excessive, but I also don't know what to do about undeterrable and essentially incurable sexual predators like Foley.

--- Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:


>
> On Oct 3, 2006, at 5:52 PM, Charles A. Grimes wrote:
>
> > Anyway, there is an ethical issue here. If you
> find nothing wrong with
> > Foley or his boyfriends, is it really a valid
> ethical position to
> > castigate him? See, I have this conflict. I hate
> jerks like Foley who
> > have made use of homophobia and some indistinct
> public
> > fear/fascination with sexuality. It would great
> fun to destory him and
> > the Repugnants with such faux scandals. But
> somehow that is just as
> > perverse a use of the political realm as the
> Right---which has
> > succeeded in destorying any political discourse,
> just as they did with
> > Clinton and Monica.
>
> Yup, exactly. That's why I posted that Dem press
> release from the
> other day with the subject heading "shameless
> pandering." It's crap.
> I can understand, from a purely opportunistic point
> of view, why
> they're doing it. But it's unprincipled crap.
>
> It's so good to see someone pointing out that
> 16-year-olds aren't
> kids, too.
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list