On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Eric wrote:
> This sounds like you are saying that the antiwar movement's
> fortunes rise and fall with the fortunes of candidates for elected
> office. It's this that I disagree with.
Do you think the antiwar movement's fortunes are tied to the reactions by elected officials (i.e., a bigger, louder, meaner movement might change they way they vote)? Or would it work through some extraparliamentary magic?
Doug