[lbo-talk] Dems & the proletariat

Yoshie Furuhashi critical.montages at gmail.com
Fri Oct 6 17:12:08 PDT 2006


On 10/6/06, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
> >> As I've pointed out many times before, by almost any measure
> >> (employment, wages, GDP, stock market), the economy has done better
> >> under Dem presidents than Rep ones since WW2. The only exception is
> >> that Reps are better for disinflation and the bond market.
> >
> > What if we compared them since the mid-1970s? After all, 1945-1973
> > and 1974-Present belong to different eras of accumulation. How do
> > Democrats and Republicans compare in the neoliberal era?
>
> 1973 wasn't yet the neoliberal era - it was the beginning of the
> terminal crisis of the Keynesian system. The neolib era really begins
> with Volcker and Reagan in the US.

IMHO, neoliberalism as a set of policies began in the 1970s, and Jimmy Carter, with his deregulation, appointment of Paul Volcker, etc., was the first POTUS to begin to put it into practice here.


> the four neolib presidents -
> Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II

Besides, if you exclude Carter, it looks like the Democratic Party seldom wins the White House in the neoliberal era.

-- Yoshie <http://montages.blogspot.com/> <http://mrzine.org> <http://monthlyreview.org/>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list