For the record, I don't think that capitalism is the rule of sinister Jews. I do think that greedy corporations and unscrupulous governments abound in capitalism, but: (a) even an "ideal type" of capitalism without those institutions would be exploitative and alienating (b) that "ideal type," of course, is a pure fiction - there will be powerful greedy corporations and unscrupulous governments as long as there's capitalism (c) so, the greedy corporations and unscrupulous governments are a necessary by-product of capitalism, but the struggle against capitalism is only incidentally (but no less necessarily) a struggle against greedy corporations and unscrupulous governments.
So we are going to continue to disagree about Chomsky and Finkelstein. Do we agree about capitalism and the struggle against it?
Chomsky and Finkelstein aside, the left has made so many wrong turns in the U.S. (and elsewhere), that the left "deserves" to lose. But the struggle against capitalism doesn't deserve to lose, and unfortunately it's stuck with us as its paltry bearers.
Michael McIntyre
On Oct 18, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Angelus Novus wrote:
> A left that reads Chomsky and Finkelstein rather than
> Marx or Lukacs deserves to lose, and lose badly.
> There are enough right-wing populists promoting
> foreshortened models of capitalism as merely the rule
> of sinister Jews, greedy corporations, and
> unscrupulous governments. If you go in for that sort
> of thing, at least become a Haider or Buchanan
> supporter and get it in undiluted form.
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20061018/e9a19f03/attachment.htm>