What's not irrational? Perhaps camping out in the Zocalo for two months. We'll see.
Michael McIntyre
On Sep 7, 2006, at 4:18 PM, andie nachgeborenen wrote:
> Actually, this is a fundamental puzzle in political
> science. If the costs of voting are more than trivial
> (and they ofen are -- campaigning in Ohio in 2004 I
> saw people stand for hours waiting to vote) and the
> likihood that voting will have any effect is
> negligible, which is certainly true, marginally
> speaking, only the last vote that tips the balance
> actually counts, why do presumptively rational people
> bother?
>
> --- Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 7, 2006, at 4:04 PM, B. wrote:
>>
>>> Oh well, Proyect knows best! That's a Dem blog he
>>> suggested as a good resource. I'll probably vote
>> Dem,
>>> actually, if Kinky and Perry are the choices. For
>>> tactical reasons. Not that I expect that to change
>>> anything, really.
>>
>> I've been voting for 34 years now, and except when I
>> was pretty
>> young, never expected it to change anything. Wonder
>> why I keep doing it.
>>
>> Doug
>> ___________________________________
>>
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20060907/95a61d88/attachment.htm>