> great show!
>
> I listened to your show ‘behind the news’? It was great. Finally
> someone who got the facts straight. I saw the damage at building 7
> and it is clearly damage that would make a building drop down in
> the way it did. It was definitely, at least 25% of the building
> that was damaged. It makes so much more sense that because of a
> twea party, as we now all know, that the fighter pilots who were to
> be scrambled were to late to intercept. It makes so much sense.
> Even the hole in the pentagon that was pictured in the NY times did
> easily fits a boeing.
>
> Its ridicules to yhink that the company that took over all the
> security in the towers a few months before were connected to Bush’s
> first cousin. Its ridicules to think that in the two weeks prior
> the towers were evacuated 3 times and the weekend before 9-11 the
> sniffer dogs were removed from the building. It is outrages to
> think that the wiring all could have been done beforehand and
> during the evacs, and that the weekend was chosen to ´click in´ the
> bombs. Outrageous.
>
> I am really glad that you talked to this pop mechanics dude who is
> so totally right in saying that these building were in actual fact
> already on the verge of collapse because the stupid towers were
> build in such a manner that they are fragile.
>
> I´m happy to hear someone like you fill the air with total logic
> and that you finally explained away all these crazy conspiracies.
> Like Silverstein said, `so we made the decision to pull, so they
> pulled the building and we watched it come down´. So ridules….
>