Carrol Cox wrote:
> I don't believe "science," science, or any other "study" is the
> relevant
> context here. The relevant context is the local activist/theorist
> trying
> to build up a permanent local extra/electoral organization. Does it
> matter to that person (or those persons) what the private
> personality of
> a third-party candidate is?
Science as rational understanding of social phenomena is relevant. If such understanding requires an understanding of personality then personality is relevant.
Ted