Or will you now convince us that shouldn't matter?
I dont have quotes on hand, but as I recall, Gore staked out a position far more interventionist than Bush, who came off as quite te reasonable one on foreign affairs, in the debates.
Or perhaps you knew what each REALLY meant?
As long as we're arguing in subjunctives, what if the Gore/Lieberman team had succeeded in their plans to steal more votes than Bush, then Gore had died halfway through his first term?
By 2004, U.S. troops would have occupied Kabul, Baghdah, Tehran, and been halfway to Damascus.
On 8/11/07, W. Kiernan <wkiernan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Chuck wrote:
> >
> > What's crazy about this is that there isn't a
> > dimes worth of difference between the two parties.
>
> Do you seriously believe that if Al Gore had been President the U.S.
> would have invaded Iraq in 2003? Or do you think the difference between
> invading Iraq and not invading Iraq is not worth a dime?
>
> Yours WDK - WKiernan at gmail.com
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>