[lbo-talk] Reply to Discussion on War on Drugs

Eddie Rivera ed_rivera83 at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 21 07:45:56 PDT 2007


Bob's post on the War on Drugs reminded me of the Documentary "Why We Fight" by Eugene Jarecki. For those of you who have not seen, it focuses on the "history" of the build-up of the military-industrial complex.

After completing a Degree in Socio-Economic Development, I've become a student of history, or at least critical history. And it seems that the US has been involved in a war or military intervention for every decade since its inception. It is pretty scary but it seems that PART of US culture is always a WAR. A War on Drugs, a War on Poverty, a War on whatever the hell it is. They should change the name of the state department to the War Department.

Robert Wrubel <bobwrubel at yahoo.com> wrote:

A realist might say that the War on Drugs was just a means for keeping the public in a state of fear, a pretext for arming crappy little right wing regimes, and a slush fund for off-budget CIA activities. Evidently, with the War on Terror going so well, the elites are in a mood for divestiture of an enterprise it can now admit is failing.

BobW

--- Michael Pollak wrote:


>
> [Excerpted by Sam Smith in his Undernews digest. He
> adds "In the nearly
> 40 years that the Review has written critically of
> federal drug policy,
> this is the first time we can recall the Post ever
> running anything close
> to this."]
>
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/17/AR2007081701716.html
>
> August 19th, 2007
> Washington Post
>
> The Lost War
>
> We've Spent 36 Years and Billions of Dollars
> Fighting It, but the Drug
> Trade Keeps Growing
>
> By Misha Glenny
>
>
>
> Thirty-six years and hundreds of billions of
> dollars after President
> Richard M. Nixon launched the war on drugs,
> consumers worldwide are
> taking more narcotics and criminals are making
> fatter profits than
> ever before. The syndicates that control
> narcotics production and
> distribution reap the profits from an annual
> turnover of $400
> billion to $500 billion. And terrorist
> organizations such as the
> Taliban are using this money to expand their
> operations and buy ever
> more sophisticated weapons, threatening Western
> security.
>
> In the past two years, the drug war has become
> the Taliban's most
> effective recruiter in Afghanistan.
> Afghanistan's Muslim extremists
> have reinvigorated themselves by supporting and
> taxing the countless
> peasants who are dependent one way or another on
> the opium trade,
> their only reliable source of income. The
> Taliban is becoming richer
> and stronger by the day, especially in the east
> and south of the
> country. The "War on Drugs" is defeating the
> "war on terror."
>
>
>
> The trade in illegal narcotics begets violence,
> poverty and tragedy.
> And wherever I went around the world, gangsters,
> cops, victims,
> academics and politicians delivered the same
> message: The war on
> drugs is the underlying cause of the misery.
> Everywhere, that is,
> except Washington, where a powerful bipartisan
> consensus has turned
> the issue into a political third rail.
>
> The problem starts with prohibition, the basis
> of the war on drugs.
> The theory is that if you hurt the producers and
> consumers of drugs
> badly enough, they'll stop doing what they're
> doing. But instead,
> the trade goes underground, which means that the
> state's only
> contact with it is through law enforcement, i.e.
> busting those
> involved, whether producers, distributors or
> users. But so vast is
> the demand for drugs in the United States, the
> European Union and
> the Far East that nobody has anything
> approaching the ability to
> police the trade.
>
> Prohibition gives narcotics huge added value as
> a commodity. Once
> traffickers get around the business risks --
> getting busted or being
> shot by competitors -- they stand to make vast
> profits. A
> confidential strategy report prepared in 2005
> for British Prime
> Minister Tony Blair's cabinet and later leaked
> to the media offered
> one of the most damning indictments of the
> efficacy of the drug war.
> Law enforcement agencies seize less than 20
> percent of the 700 tons
> of cocaine and 550 tons of heroin produced
> annually. According to
> the report, they would have to seize 60 to 80
> percent to make the
> industry unprofitable for the traffickers.
>
> Supply is so plentiful that the price of a gram
> of heroin is
> plummeting in Europe, especially in the United
> Kingdom. As for
> cocaine, according to the UNODC, the street
> price of a gram in the
> United States is now less than $70, compared
> with $184 in 1990.
> Adjusted for inflation, that's a threefold drop.
>
>
>
> In Washington, the war on drugs has been a
> third-rail issue since
> its inauguration. It's obvious why -- telling
> people that their kids
> can do drugs is the kiss of death at the ballot
> box. But that was
> before 9/11. Now the drug war is undermining
> Western security
> throughout the world. In one particularly
> revealing conversation, a
> senior official at the British Foreign Office
> told me, "I often
> think we will look back at the War on Drugs in a
> hundred years' time
> and tell the tale of 'The Emperor's New
> Clothes.' This is so
> stupid."
>
> How right he is.
>
> ---
>
> misha.glenny at which.net
>
> Misha Glenny is a former BBC correspondent and
> the author of
> "McMafia: A Journey Through the Global
> Underworld," to be published
> next year.
>
> Full article at:
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/17/AR2007081701716.html
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

--------------------------------- Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list