--- Michael Pollak <mpollak at panix.com> wrote:
>
> >
>
<http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/12/a_huckabee_ally_on_el_rushbo.php>
> >
> > "Also, I have to think that he's dying to have
> Hillary in the White
> > House. Bill Clinton made Rush a megastar. Having
> another Clinton back in
> > power would make him the Leading Voice of the
> Opposition once again."
>
> Y'know, I just realize this second answer to the
> subject line question is
> incoherent. What does wanting Clinton as President
> have to do with being
> against Huck as the Repug nominee? You could have
> both. And in fact you
> probably would if those two were the nominees. On a
> national level,
> Huckabee is probably the weakest candidate the Repug
> are fielding.
> Nominating him would probably be best smooth
> Clinton's path to the White
> House. He'd probably be the evangelical equivalent
> of the McGovern
> disaster.
>
> Hmm. That's almost something to hope for. If only
> it didn't smack of
> being too clever by half...
>
> Michael
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs