[lbo-talk] Iran May Have Trained Attackers That Killed 5 American Soldiers, U.S. and Iraqis Say

[Yoshie Furuhashi]

It's another Judith Miller moment at the New York Times. -- Yoshie

<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/world/middleeast/31karbala.html>
January 31, 2007
Iran May Have Trained Attackers That Killed 5 American Soldiers, U.S.
and Iraqis Say
By JAMES GLANZ and MARK MAZZETTI

BAGHDAD, Jan. 30 — Investigators say they believe that attackers who
used American-style uniforms and weapons to infiltrate a secure
compound and kill five American soldiers in Karbala on Jan. 20 may
have been trained and financed by Iranian agents, according to
American and Iraqi officials knowledgeable about the inquiry.

The officials said the sophistication of the attack astonished
investigators, who doubt that Iraqis could have carried it out on
their own — one reason a connection to Iran is being closely examined.
Officials cautioned that no firm conclusions had been drawn and did
not reveal any direct evidence of a connection.

A senior Iraqi official said the attackers had carried forged American
identity cards and American-style M-4 rifles and had thrown stun
grenades of a kind used only by American forces here.

Tying Iran to the deadly attack could be helpful to the Bush
administration, which has been engaged in an escalating war of words
with Iran.

One American soldier was killed during the initial attack and four
more were abducted and killed shortly afterward as the police pursued
the sport utility vehicles used in the attack.

The attack was focused on a meeting at a joint security station, where
American and Iraqi forces mesh their efforts in the new security plan.

An Iraqi knowledgeable about the investigation said four suspects had
been detained and questioned. Based on those interviews, investigators
have concluded that as they fled Karbala with the abducted Americans,
the attackers used advanced devices to monitor police communications
and avoid the roads where the police were searching.

The suspects have also told investigators that "a religious group in
Najaf" was involved in the operation, the Iraqi said, in a clear
reference to the Mahdi Army, the militia controlled by the breakaway
Shiite cleric, Moktada al-Sadr. If that information holds up, it would
dovetail with assertions by several Iraqi officials that Iran is
financing and training a small number of splinter groups from the
Mahdi Army to carry out special operations and assassinations.

"I hear that there are a number of commando and assassination squads
that are disconnected and controlled directly by Iran," the senior
Iraqi official said, citing information directly from the prime
minister's office. "They have supplied JAM and others with significant
weaponry and training," he said using shorthand for the group, from
its name in Arabic, Jaish al Mahdi.

Confirmation of a Mahdi Army connection to the deadly incident would
also support the argument by Bush administration officials that the
group has a direct role in attacks on American troops.

Another senior Iraqi official said that military actions by the United
States against JAM essentially pushed it toward Iran.

"During the conflicts between the Mahdi Army and the United States,
Iran was the only side that supported JAM," the official said. "And
they told them, 'Hey, we are here to help you and we are here to
support you, and we will not let you down.' "

The Karbala operation involved 9 to 12 armed militants and at least
five sport utility vehicles, the American military has said. The
initial attack on the compound killed one American soldier and damaged
three Humvees, the military said.

But what has caught the attention of investigators is the way the
convoy of S.U.V.'s was able to give the impression that it was
American and slip through Iraqi checkpoints unchallenged. An American
military official said all possibilities were being explored, with the
focus on whom the United States can trust, even among senior Iraqi
officials, in the Karbala area.

"We've got to be very careful as to who we define as our allies, and
who we trust and who we don't," the military official said. "Was the
governor involved? Were the Iraqi police that were on guard complicit
or just incompetent?"

The unusual nature of the attack has made it a major topic of
discussion in the upper echelons of the Iraqi government. It has
spawned bizarre theories including the idea that a Western mercenary
group was somehow involved.

But the existence of what American commanders sometimes call "rogue
JAM" — separate from the central, controlled militia — has put the
Mahdi Army at the center of the investigation, officials say.

Two American officials in Washington confirmed that American military
investigators were looking into the possibility of Iranian involvement
in the Karbala attack. One of those officials said the working
assumption by the investigators was that the operation had been
carried out by a splinter group of the Mahdi Army.

The second official said the operation could be seen as retribution
for three recent American raids in which Iranians suspected of
carrying out attacks on American and Iraqi forces were detained. On
Sunday, the Iranian ambassador to Iraq conceded that two Iranians
detained in Baghdad last month were security officials, but said that
they were making legitimate contacts with Iraqi government officials.

<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/washington/31diplo.html>
January 31, 2007
Choice for No. 2 at State Dept. Defends Bush's Stance on Iran
By HELENE COOPER

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Pentagon announced Tuesday that it had suspended the sale of spare
parts for American-made F-14 fighter jets lest they end up in Iran,
the only nation whose air force still flies the vintage plane. Many of
the parts are common to other aircraft. The United States Navy retired
its last squadrons in 2006.

Mr. Bush announced this month that the United States would send
another aircraft carrier and its supporting ships to the Persian Gulf,
a response to the growing concern that Iran is building up its own
missile capacity and naval power to dominate the gulf militarily.

Meanwhile, the administration has continued to resist calls for it to
initiate talks with Iran, and has said that it will do so only if
Tehran suspends its enrichment of uranium.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Several senators on the [Senate Foreign Relations] committee praised
Mr. Negroponte as one of the most distinguished public servants of his
generation, and there appeared to be no obstacle to his confirmation
[as deputy secretary of state].

At a separate confirmation hearing on Tuesday, the admiral picked to
lead American forces in the Middle East said Iran was increasing its
military capabilities and seeking to curb American influence. "They
are posturing themselves with the capability to attempt to deny us the
ability to operate in this vicinity," Adm. William J. Fallon told the
Senate Armed Services Committee.

<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/washington/30cnd-fallon.html>
January 30, 2007
Admiral Calls for 'New and Different' Approach in Iraq
By CHRISTINE HAUSER

The admiral who has been nominated to be the next head of the United
States Central Command said today during a Senate confirmation hearing
that a "new and different" course of action was needed in Iraq and he
warned about Iran's "support" for terrorism beyond its borders.

The officer, Adm. William J. Fallon, is currently in command of all
American forces in the Pacific. The Bush administration's decision
this month to recommend him as the next head of the United States
Central Command reflected a wish for experienced eyes on both vast
land areas and strategic waterways through which oil supplies,
contraband and suspected terrorists can pass, senior Pentagon
civilians and military officers have said.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Central Command region stretches from Kenya in the southwest
through all of the Middle East to Kazakhstan in the northeast. While
it now encompasses the two combat theaters of Afghanistan and Iraq,
the fact that Admiral Fallon, with his extensive naval aviation
experience, was picked showed the increasing focus of the Bush
administration on putting pressure on Iran.

Sen. Carl Levin, the committee chairman, said that the head of central
command would need to provide "straightforward independent advice" on
the most effective course of action for deterring Iran's attempts to
"acquire nuclear weapons and to dominate its neighbors."

Mr. Levin, a Democrat from Michigan, also warned that Syria poses a
challenge to security in the region.

-- 
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>