Oh brother, you just don't get it.
> There were no good guys in the civil war. And the
> anarchists were more bloodthirsty than either the
> whites or the reds. They were famous for it. Famous.
That's your opinion. The anarchists were fighting against the Whites and the new Russian government. When you are fighting against a bunch of fascists and bunch of power-hungry commies who are hell-bent on recuperating the revolution for ther own ends, I'd hope that the anarchists would fight for the people and the revolution. Bllod-thirsty? I think not.
It's too bad the anarchists lost. The authoritarian communists set up th Soviet Union, squashed liberty and freedom for the rural people, and the rest is history.
Chuck