Health care experts (doctors, nurses, etc.) should give us the options and the public, not self-appointed representatives, should have the final say--it is not for politicians and pundits to patronize us with what is and is not "realistic"; the fact is, they don't know enough about what they're talking about to honestly claim to know what is or is not realistic. (Perhaps it would be more accurate to describe our representative political system a "patrocracy" rather than a "democracy".)
Peter Ward Crank Brooklyn, NY
On Jul 9, 2007, at 7:36 PM, B. wrote:
> Screen capture w/ FOX News headline, transcript:
>
> http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2007/07/05/fox-news-universal-
> health-care-breeds-terrorists/?url=http://thinkprogress.org/
> 2007/07/05/fox-news-universal-health-care-breeds-terrorists/
> &frame=true
>
>
> BOWYER: A state run health care enterprise is
> bureaucratic, and I think the terrorists have shown
> over and over again, whether it’s dealing with INS or
> whether it’s dealing with airport security, they’re
> very good at gaming the system with bureaucracies.
> They’re very good at getting around bureaucracies. […]
>
> And if one of your guys is a jihadist, if one of your
> doctors is spending all the time online reading Osama
> bin Laden fatwas, someone’s going to notice that. But
> the National Health Serfvice is more like the post
> office, you know there’s a lot of anonymity, it’s easy
> to hide in the bureaucracy.
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>