That's what you got from Bradsher's book?
SUV's existed long before 1990 but they sold in tiny numbers. Why the explosion in sales if not because of marketing? Why didn't they sell in large numbers because of their appeal to the atavistic reptilian instincts?
The corporations saw both tax loopholes and EPA loopholes that they could exploit if they CREATED a demand for SUV's so they set about doing just that. Certainly powerful cars appeal to many people but desires for automobiles are extremely pliable and easily manipulated. Getting people to purchase economical cars would be exceedingly simple if corporations decided to really market them.
For whatever it's worth hybrids hold a huge potential for performance vehicles. The electric motors used for propulsion offer 100% of their available torque at 1 RPM, something no IC engine can come close to matching. The real future of high performance cars lies with hybrids. The corporations could push hybrids as performance cars like Mustang's, Camaro's and their like if they wanted to.
I'd favor a vehicle tax based on MPG to "punish" Hummer buyers and "reward" Honda buyers. I'd even go so far as to offer tax rebates for people with vehicles that get above some specific MPG rating. Just making all vehicle use terribly expensive hurts working class people too much and would simply create a backlash of resentment to efforts to increase fuel efficiency.
John Thornton