Travis
Quoting Robert Wrubel <bobwrubel at yahoo.com>:
> Ravi said: "the entire purpose of the threats towards
> Iran is to have an ongoing "crisis" to serve as a
> diversion."
>
> Andy answered: "True, perhaps.... But I don't think
> I'll ever get over being disabused of the notion that
> invading Iraq was just too goddamn stupid to happen."
>
> In the world of "diversions" and distractions, it's
> not necessary to believe that the administration knows
> at all times what's real and what's not, or what's
> stupid and not. It's smart to be skeptical about any
> current bruhaha, but at the same time, you shouldnt
> discount the possibility that, for reasons we may not
> guess, the admin may stumble into something really
> horrible. When you have as much power as they do, and
> as many ways of exercising it, and as great a cloak of
> secrecy, and as many different pressures and interests
> clamoring for attention, who knows what will happen?
> It's not as as if some judicious ruling body (the
> "establishment", Goldman Sachs, etc.) is calling all
> the shots.
>
> I agree with both Ravi and Andy. It's not in the
> cards, but dont bet on it.
>
> BobW
>
> > On 7/31/07, ravi <ravi at platosbeard.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I do not believe an invasion of Iran is on the
> > cards... not only is
> > > it curtailed by logistic concerns but also the
> > entire purpose of the
> > > threats towards Iran is to have an ongoing
> > "crisis" to serve as a
> > > diversion.
> >
> > True, perhaps.... But I don't think I'll ever get
> > over being
> > disabused of the notion that invading Iraq was just
> > too goddamn stupid
> > to happen.
> >
> > --
> > Andy
> > ___________________________________
> >
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>