In other words local economies have an absorptive capacity. Any measure which does not increase the absorptive capacity threatens to undermine local markets and leave locals worse off once the gush works it way through and devaluation sets in.
I am afraid there is simply no substitute for public planning in economies which do not already have robust private institutions of coordination and planning.i.e in economies that are already developed.
Neoliberalism was such a colossal failure for the south precisely because markets must be created, i.e., they are not just waiting to be liberated by disparate individuals walking around with pockets full of cash. And the creation of robust private markets takes a long time and a lot of public and private institutions.
*In this regard* new institutionalism looks radical compared to the neoclassical ontology. Even the world Bank is making the "radical" shift in perspective and in this regard,IMHO, Yunus would be a step back for the World Bank because he is neoliberalism redux.
Travis
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Perelman <michael at ecst.csuchico.edu>
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:13:31 -0700
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Announcing Muhammad Yunus' Candidacy to Head
> the World Bank
>
> For the World Bank to become useless would be a great step forward.
>
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:35:31PM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 1, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Robert Naiman wrote:
> >
> > > Announcing Muhammad Yunus' Candidacy to Head the World Bank Hotlist
> > > by Robert Naiman Fri Jun 01, 2007 at 09:43:04 AM PDT
> >
> > Do you have any evidence that microlending actually works? I haven't
> > looked at the issue in a while, but last time I did, it was useless.
> >
> > Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk