Ah, the epistemic gerrymandering of the combinatorial complementarities between/within KM and the pomo writers of one's choice; is that a modernist strategy for creating a Quinean/Lakatosian web of belief or neoDadaism or something *after the after* of the mo/pomo binary "itself"? :->
Ian
^^^^^
CB: "Gerrymandering" implies an invalid redrawing of the boundaries, but here with "combinatorial complementarities" it means the anti-boundaries (world without borders) ?
( Did Dadaist use automatic writing ?)