[lbo-talk] Sex and Capitalism

Yoshie Furuhashi critical.montages at gmail.com
Tue Mar 6 23:52:11 PST 2007


On 3/6/07, James Heartfield <Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> "James, I quoted you the BLS's figures for aggregate hours worked in
> the private sector ...They show a rise nearly twice the rate of the overall
> growth in the pop.. ...Why do you have such a hard time believing this?
>
> Doug"
>
> Doug, it is not that I have a hard time believing this,
> it is just that I am not used to the idea that immigration
> and more women in work is a bad thing.

On 3/6/07, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
> More women working (for pay - they've always worked without pay) is a
> good thing. It makes them more independent of men. But it also means
> that the number of paid work hours in the society has risen
> dramatically, with little assistance for child or elder care (two
> things that are on my male mind right now, too).

A good thing can't come without a bad thing for they are two sides of the same coin. More capitalism and more sex/gender equality have gone hand in hand just about everywhere, from American capitalism to Swedish social democracy to Cuban socialism. That being the case, resistance to a bad thing, more often than not, comes with resistance to a good thing. -- Yoshie <http://montages.blogspot.com/> <http://mrzine.org> <http://monthlyreview.org/>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list