[lbo-talk] Russia (was kvetching...)

andie nachgeborenen andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Wed May 9 08:19:45 PDT 2007


As socialists we are not supposed to like a politically authoritarian, kleptocratic, wildly inegalitarian capitalist system that substitutes arbitrary force force for reliable rule of law and accords working people some goodies but no power. We, or most of us, didn't like Stalinism either. At the same same, no one is "rubbishing" Russia's economic growth, but trying to understand it. So far its defenders here have said nothing to refute the empirically supported hypothesis advanced by Anderson, urged by me and Doug, among others, that it's based on raw material export, not industrial development. Even if that lasts forever, which isn't likely, it portends a future in which Russia looks like lots of other underdeveloped countries the industrialized world exploits for their resources -- a thin glaze of expensive Western chains imported for the benefit of a compliant comrador class while the rest of country suffers. Say why it ain't so. In contrast, China, whose social and economic syste, I also dislike, is developing a serious industrial base of its own. As Anderson observes, after centuries of condescension, Russia look to end up as the junior partner in this arrangement with the Asian giants. That's even if if oil prices remain stratospheric and Sbarro's (ik!) spreads thoughout the land. Sweet victory? I don't think so.

--- Chris Doss <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com> wrote:


>
> --- James Heartfield <Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> I think that strong desire has something to do with
> trying to deny that progress is possible with a
> socio-political-economic system that they don't
> personally like. :)
>
> >
> > I think the strong desire that commentators like
> > Perry Anderson have to
> > rubbish Russia's growth is what needs explaining.
> I
> > remember that not so
> > long ago a lot of people wanted to prove that
> > China's growth was peripheral.
> > (The otherwise very perceptive Michel Chossudovsky
> > wrote analyses of the
> > Special Economic Zones as a return to the
> > concessionary zones.) Is this what
> > was meant by "kvetching"?
> >
>
> Lyubo, bratsy, lyubo, lyubo, bratsy, zhit!
>
> ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ËÞÁÎ, ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ÆÈÒÜ!
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Expecting? Get great news right away with email
> Auto-Check.
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
>
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list