[lbo-talk] Russia's economy

Chris Doss lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com
Wed May 9 12:15:32 PDT 2007


Oh yeah, one other point I meant to make: --- James Heartfield <Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> "As socialists we are not supposed to like a
> politically authoritarian,
> kleptocratic, wildly inegalitarian capitalist system
> that substitutes
> arbitrary force force for reliable rule of law and
> accords working people
> some goodies but no power."
>
> Well, ok, but let's not the wish be father to the
> thought. If this
> dictatorial government is growing the economy it
> seems silly to criticise it
> for not doing so when what you actually want to do
> is criticise it for
> oppressing the people.
>

See, you might have a problem here. Russians do not feel oppressed by the federal government. They feel oppressed by the stuff they actually encounter in their lives, which is corrupt police, courts, and regional governments and crime (the latter often linked to the former). A point I have made again and again, but which has apparently not sunk in, is that Russians, especially in the provinces, suffer from the WEAKNESS of the federal center, not its overweaning strength. Accordingly, they favor its being strengthened and the regional powers being weakened, which is why most people supported the abolition of direct elections of governors. Why? BECAUSE THERE WERE NO ACTUAL ELECTIONS OF GOVERNORS. The President of Tatarstan was "reelected" with something like 98% of the vote. Kalmykia is much the same.

Lyubo, bratsy, lyubo, lyubo, bratsy, zhit!

ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ËÞÁÎ, ËÞÁÎ, ÁÐÀÒÖÛ, ÆÈÒÜ!

____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list