Doug Henwood wrote:
>
>
> Carrol has never really explained how his systemic abstractions
Of course not. No more than any modern astronomer argues that Galileo was right. There was a huge literature on this in the '60s and '70s. Go look it up. I'm certainly not going to rehearse it here. It's simply established beyond the need for argument. The only arguments are over, given this fact, how do we proceed strategically and tactically.
Carrol