A simple scatter plot tells you that taxes as a share of GDP are closely correlated, negatively, with income taxes as a share of tax revenue. The one big exception is Sweden -- big taxes and big income tax.
>a VAT soaks the
>midrange - but the redistributive action really happens on the
>spending side (health insurance, child care, income support, etc.).
>[WS:] True. . . .
>Progressive taxation is really a lame of way of income redistribution -
We are singing from the same hymnbook.
The classic flat tax, by the way, IS a VAT, but with a standard deduction and exemptions. Better for a developing country, IMO, then dropping a 15-20 percent price increase on the heads of all persons rich and poor alike.