Deceiving people with power and authority to demonstrate either individual abuse of that power/authority or expose the systemic problems created by the nature of the power/authority relationship is sometimes necessary. This has NOTHING to do with the concern I posted. Incidentally, I don't have a large problem with EB's dishonesty. I have a minor problem with it. My response was a reply to the question "whatever could anyone object to concerning EB?" rather than a post about my personal feelings about EB but the difference between those ideas seems to have escaped some people.
I'll repost my question. Is it acceptable to pretend to be wheelchair bound to gain the confidence of others with disabilities in order to write a book about disabilities that is in the same vein as N&D? Is it acceptable to pretend to be a veteran of the Iraq war to gain the confidence of Iraq veterans in order to write a similar book? Does everyone who feels EB's deception is a non-issue feel the above examples are also non-issues and why or why not?
It isn't as if I rake EB over the coals for her deception, I merely stated that it makes some people uncomfortable and I am among them. Apparently even being made uncomfortable by such deceptive practices is simply too much for some list members who feel the need to label anyone who questions such practices a moral purist. Some to the point of deliberately misrepresenting what I have written to make me appear to hold untenable positions I do hold. Kind of sad in a way.
John Thornton