[lbo-talk] [Fwd: Re: Query about _A Modest Defence of Publick Stews_ (1724)]

Carrol Cox cbcox at ilstu.edu
Sat Oct 13 18:16:26 PDT 2007


-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Query about _A Modest Defence of Publick Stews_ (1724) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:22:37 -0700 From: Robert Folkenflik <rfolkenf at BENFRANKLIN.HNET.UCI.EDU> Reply-To: 18th Century Interdisciplinary Discussion <C18-L at lists.psu.edu> To: C18-L at LISTS.PSU.EDU

Yes, Phil Porney, the "lover of prostitutes" is an ironic pseudoonym (though not acronym), but Mr. Porney, who shows up as the author of a number of works, seems to have been a French teacher and translator.

Robert Folkenflik Professor of English University of California Irvine, CA 92697

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, John Dussinger wrote:

Distinguished List,

I have yet another question about an anonymous work-- _A Modest Defence of Publick Stews_ (1724). In my youth I had always assumed that it was written by Bernard Mandeville, along with all the ironic play of his _Fable of the Bees_ toward awakening the English public to the economic benefits of vice, whatever the moral outrage resulting from these revelations. In the ODNB, M.M. Goldsmith leaves open the question of whether Mandeville was the author of _A Modest Defence_ and cites a Lawrence Lefever as a possible alternative. Yet in ECCO the digital copies of the original microfilm texts come up with "Phil-porney" as the author, surely an ironic acronym, but nevertheless not mentioned in the ODNB article on Bernard Mandeville.

Can anyone help clarify whether we should give up entirely the idea of Mandeville as the author of this piece on public whorehouses? If so, can we safely attribute it to some other author and maybe explain why ESTC settled with that "Phil-porney" signature to the Dedication?

JD

This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list