[lbo-talk] The shock doctrine

[Robert Wrubel]

For a current example, I would think the sub-prime
mortgage bubble indicated there was more capital
needing to be invested than there were profitable and
safe opportunities for it.  I imagine the same logic
applies to other current financial products, though I
dont know the specifics (enlightenment welcomed!) 
Aren't all bubbles the result of excess capital
without usual channels of investment?  

BobW

--- Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:


> 
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 9:32 AM, Robert Wrubel wrote:
> 
> > waning profitable investment arenas
> 
> Capital is rolling in it. What's your evidence for
> this waning?
> 
> Doug
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>