>Of course, being an email veteran, I see this as shortsighted and
>dismissive. What about all the lovely, complex thoughts you can
>transmit via a carefully crafted email -- the sort of email you
>compose, and re-compose over the course of long minutes, hours, maybe
>even days? Nonsense, the youngsters say.
>
shag [11:14] not shag [11:14] to mention shag [11:14] that those thoughts shag [11:15] will actually be crafted shag [11:15] in actual sentences and paragraphs shag [11:15] rather than being typed snippet shag [11:15] by snippet while you wait, shag [11:15] reading each line, wondering if shag [11:15] you should jump in and respond .... shag [11:16] and whether, if you do, in all those shag [11:17] lines, might your interlocutor miss shag [11:17] what you typed.... that one lone line shag [11:17] doesn't really show up in the midst shag [11:18] of all that line by line by painstaking shag [11:18] fucking line of IMspeak LOL heheheheheheheh
http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)