[lbo-talk] The right to own bloody great weapons: was nominally about clemency

Bill Bartlett billbartlett at aapt.net.au
Fri Dec 5 21:28:51 PST 2008


At 10:43 PM -0500 5/12/08, Percival Myers wrote:


> I agree that it's dumb to think that the second amendment
>is obsolete because shotguns are no match for gunships. It doesn't
>take much intelligence to see that there is a large difference between
>said shotgun, a slingshot, a 50 BMG, and a stinger missile but it
>takes a certain amount of honesty to admit that the second amendment
>sees no difference between them.

What about the right to bear nuclear arms? Is that implied as well?

Bill Bartlett Bracknell Tas



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list