> I agree that it's dumb to think that the second amendment
>is obsolete because shotguns are no match for gunships. It doesn't
>take much intelligence to see that there is a large difference between
>said shotgun, a slingshot, a 50 BMG, and a stinger missile but it
>takes a certain amount of honesty to admit that the second amendment
>sees no difference between them.
What about the right to bear nuclear arms? Is that implied as well?
Bill Bartlett Bracknell Tas