[lbo-talk] Chickens and unfertilized eggs (was Catholicism, was Re: blacks about...

John Thornton jthorn65 at sbcglobal.net
Sun Dec 14 14:36:50 PST 2008


Shane Mage wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2008, at 4:52 PM, John Thornton wrote:
>>
>> However a person in say 1750 operated under the presumption that
>> their eggs were indeed unfertilized if they owned several hens but no
>> roosters. A practice apparently more common than you are aware.
>> Why on earth would they believe otherwise?
>
>
> Because a farmer with hens but no roosters would very quickly become a
> farmer with no chickens at all.
>
>
> Shane Mage

Gods man but you're childish. Ok, you're right, before 1901 no one ever presumed their eggs were unfertilized. You win. Congratulations on your stunning victory.

John Thornton



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list