[lbo-talk] Naomi Klein Goes Daft

Simon Ward sedward at btinternet.com
Wed Feb 6 10:10:20 PST 2008


It can't help that electioneering requires more and more money. Almost by definition, a radical agenda isn't going to attract those with money - those with a hefty stake in the ruling system - and any candidate operating from within either of the main parties isn't going to run without a money-raising machine.

As if that wasn't enough, it seems also that the vast majority on the US, and in other first world countries, see a solution to their personal economic woes in an improvement in the status quo. You ask the average worker what will improve his lot and he'll opt for jobs rather than a radical shift in capital ownership.

Should it surprise any on this list that the Democratic Party is not a house of radicals?

Simon


> Why is the DP the graveyard of radical political movements? Could it
> be that once such movements try to get beyond their initial
> ideological or regional base and break onto the national scene, they
> just can't make the transition? Is that really the fault of the DP,
> or of trying to make radical politics broadly popular in a rather
> conservative country?
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list