You're being awfully accommodating to racist rhetoric here aren't you? Why not chose 75% instead of 90%? Why chose a number at all? What if he claimed income inequality was 90% solved and we only have to tweak that final 10% before we're all equally able to enjoy the "fruits of capitalism"? Would you air no complaints about that rhetoric as well? Would most people in the bottom 25% income bracket be equally accommodating? He is selling out everyone of color with this statement and you may feel inclined to brush it off but I certainly am not. Why give Obama a pass on this BS? Would you give Clinton a similar pass if she said something this offensive and stupid?
John Thornton