Obama's speeches are worth paying attention to because their relentless moralism makes clear what he's trying to do -- cover with smooth names the contradictions between the interests of the few and those of the many in this country. He's smart enough both to know that's the problem and strenuously to pretend that the problem doesn't exist. (Harvard, as it has for centuries, is in the business of educating the progeny of the ruling class and -- perhaps more importantly -- talented members of other classes who'll run errands for them.)
David Brooks (praising) today accurately describes Obama's speeches: they are "abstract, secular sermons of personal uplift -- filled with disquisitions on the nature of hope and the contours of change. He talks about erasing old categories like red and blue (and implicitly, black and white) and replacing them with new categories, of which the most important are new and old."
It's all balderdash, of course. But it's well-said that "Obama's post-everything, togetherness-via-neoliberalism message of ambiguously described tomorrowhood may indeed be the next phase of American power politics." It's instructive that, of the the two winners in Iowa, the Republican is by far the more vocal opponent of Wall Street. --CGE
Charles Brown wrote:
>
> ...
> Voting for Obama is an anti-fascist act? Tell it to the Pakistanis.
>
> ^^^^
> CB: Why don't you pass it on to them. Let them know I said it. In fact
> , tell the whole world: It's an anti-fascist leading indicator when a
> bunch of white Americans vote for a Black person. I mean a normal Black
> person, not Condeleeza Rice that type.
>
> ^^^^
>
> Nice to know that major agri-business firms, among other corporate
> backers, are part of the Good Fight as well.
>
> Dennis