On Jan 28, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Henwood wrote:
> SC didn't put much of a dent in the bettors' evaluation of HRC's
> chances:
They seem to discount completely the possibility of a multiple-ballot convention, and therefore give a virtually zero probability that anyone but Clinton or Obama would be nominated--even though the most "electable" possibilities are Gore and Edwards. Is this realistic--or just freakonomics?
Shane Mage
"Thunderbolt steers all things...it consents and does not consent to be called Zeus."
Herakleitos of Ephesos