On Jul 6, 2008, at 1:22 PM, shag wrote:
> because i don't think the two analyses, yours and his, are
> incompatible. i explained why in previous post.
>
> for you, why do some intellectuals valorize manual labor as more
> important, more in touch with the real world? what makes your
> analysis, in your view, incompatible with carrol's?
I don't see the point his point.