>On Jul 6, 2008, at 1:22 PM, shag wrote:
>
>>because i don't think the two analyses, yours and his, are
>>incompatible. i explained why in previous post.
>>
>>for you, why do some intellectuals valorize manual labor as more
>>important, more in touch with the real world? what makes your
>>analysis, in your view, incompatible with carrol's?
>
>I don't see the point his point.
well, i'm trying to understand. you say anti intellectualism is about valorizing labor, right? why do intellectuals valorize manual labor? you don't have to get his point to answer me.
shag
http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)