Yes, but I think the context here is the Anglo-American world, in which, as Gadamer wrote someplace, the knowledge that Heidegger was a member of the NSDAP was taken as a Big Event in the late 80s-early 90s as if nobody had ever heard of it before.
--- On Tue, 7/8/08, moominek at aol.com <moominek at aol.com> wrote:
>
> Nice question. There is a very qualified debate about
> Heidegger, his philosophy and politics and the field in
> wich they were produced in Pierrre Bourdieus book
> on "The political onotology of Martin
> Heidegger", first published in France in "Actes
> de la recherche en science sociales" and in the german
> publishing house Syndikat in 1975. The arguments in the
> books show, I think so, the connection between
> "high" philosophy and brute politics in this case
> clearly.
>
> And the background is to be found not in debates on
> postmodernism, in 1975 only to come, but the debate around
> Sartre.
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> AOL eMail auf Ihrem Handy! Ab sofort können Sie auch
> unterwegs Ihre AOL email abrufen. Registrieren Sie sich
> jetzt kostenlos.
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk