I have no idea what occupation would have the most
impact. I'm just skeptical of claims that one is more
useless than the next, and it really does entail a
choice. There are not too many combination nuclear
physicist/lead guitarists like Buckaroo Banzai.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: B.
> Sent: 07/14/08 01:08 pm
> To: LBO Talk
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] URPE Summer Conference -- Aug 15-18 -- REGISTER
> NOW! ORGANIZE A PANEL!
>
> Well, I would hope not too many people would believe
> in the false dichotomy of working directly with the
> poor or being a policy wonk. I mean, working directly
> with the poor is not exactly something leftists, or
> anyone, should discourage. It's badly needed. Whether
> it's doctors, organizers, social workers, or whatever.
>
> If encouraging more people to become anti-capitalist
> economists would hasten the creation of a
> post-capitalist society, then I'm all for that, too.
> But mostly I would like to see people doing whatever
> it takes to make a post-capitalist society happen. I
> dunno if that entails getting a good paying job with
> your degree, or not.
>
> -B.
>
>
>
> sawicky at verizon.net wrote:
>
> "You could become a doctor and tend to the poor with
> zero political impact. Could you have more impact
> teaching English lit? I doubt it."
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>