> ===================================
> Exactly! Would Lenin follow the (bad) intellectual philistines in
> characterizing the following passage from Guattari as somehow unintelligible
> to the masses?
>
> "We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between
> linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this
> multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of
> scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their
> expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded
> middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we
> criticised previously."
>
> I think not!
===============
Nothing new there; philosophers have been pointing out problems with "the law" of the excluded middle for millennia.
And what's so bad about science fiction anyway? :-)
Ian