> Shag:
>
> i can't figure out *why* max and julio are obama hacks. *shrug*
>
> ..............
>
>
> To be fair, Julio has presented a well constructed case. I disagree
> with him but have zero difficulty understanding his POV because it's
> so clearly stated: Obama's campaign has raised expectations and
> created excitement. These are good things; something progressive will
> hopefully come of it.
>
>
>
> Max, on the other hand, has been a bit cagier. His contributions have
> gone a little something like this:
>
>
> LBO Poster:
>
> Here's an article on why Obama's Tasty Milk for Tender Kitties program
> (TMTK) isn't all it's cracked up to be.
>
>
> Max:
>
> It's better than Hillary's
>
>
> Another LBO Poster:
>
> Not really. Both TMTK plans are little more than campaign rhetoric at
> this point. But even from the little we have to go on, it's easy to
> see that Obama's plan won't put more tasty milk in the bellies of
> tender kitties
>
>
> Max:
>
> Obama's web site has a good outline of his TMTK plan - I'll do a
> detailed write up about why it's teh awesome at some point.
>
>
> Yet Another LBO Poster:
>
> Just went to Obama's site - he doesn't say much about TMTK beyond
> this: "kittens, like all of us, are eager for change...and milk. With
> my ten point TMTK plan, they'll get both! [Youtube clip of supporters
> - "Yay!!!"]
>
>
> Max:
>
> Still better than Hillary's.
>
>
> And Still Another LBO Poster:
>
> Why?
>
>
>
> Max:
>
> Lucretia, my reflection.
>
>
>
> LBOTalk as a whole:
>
> ???
>
>
>
>
> .d.
>
>
>
> --
> "I somehow doubt that 20 years of amphetamines and failure have changed
> you."
>
> Dr. Impossible
>
> ......................
> http://monroelab.net/blog/
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)