"It is conceivable that a significantly reduced U.S. force might remain in Iraq for a more extended period of time. Such a reduced but active presence will also send a clear message to hostile countries like Iran and Syria that we intend to remain a key player in this region."
How is an "active presence" as "a key player" not a murderous policy in this instance?
John Thornton
Max Sawicky wrote:
> Which murderous policy would that be?
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: Jerry Monaco
>> Sent: 11:28 am
>> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] BHO & working-class whites
>>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Max B. Sawicky <sawicky at verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Phooey. I've got $20 says Obama wins Pennsylvania in November.
>>>
>> The question is will you support his murderous policies once he is
>> elected
>> president? Or don't you believe that his policies as stated are
>> murderous?
>>
>> Jerry
>>