> i've always seen him as speaking to people who want
> radical change, with the primary target being the
> elimination of capitalism. people who under most
> circumstances recognize that the change isn't going to
> come about through electoral politics. ("under most"
> because in years divisible by four, they get
> distracted....)
Then why does he criticize people for not being practical, i.e., for not coming up with some sort of alternative bailout plan? Practicality in a capitalist society is always capitalist practicality. Why does he insist on other people saving the very thing he wants eliminated?