The signature line suggests the problem is the US public. The US public has a much better position on national health insurance than the Obama campaign does; sizable majorities are for it, even when misleadingly asked if they'd support increased taxes to pay for it. (Misleading because taxes would replace the premiums they're currently paying.)
The ad is surprisingly craven, and I thought I was past surprise in this campaign. No-one is advocating 'government-run health care.' The phrase itself is a slur. And if they were, it would be cheaper, not more expensive.
>If you want change, work to elect the candidate whose ear you will be more likely to have, wait after the?election and then start lobbying as if your life depended on it.
?Wojtek
Lobbying? WTF? How about organizing? Except if you believe people come in mobs "incapable of weighing ideas" then you probably think that's pointless and naive.
Jenny Brown