>CB: I recall one question in the exchange between us (below) as being
>whether the Enquirer does _news_.
When Edwards has a love child that's news, like it or not.
>the family tragedy of the Simpsons are of private ,
>not public, interest and import, and it is an abuse of the press
>function to waste so much ink on them.
Murder is of public interest and import and has been since long before the Enquirer came along.
>And the people reading this stuff are acting like busy bodies and
>peeping toms.
How can you type while you're wagging a finger?
>No way you can move _The Enquirer_ out of the "sensation rag"
>category.
I'm not interested in that kind of move. That would be your hobby horse