Your post above (and another recent one about Chavez presenting Obama with a book) inspired me to bring the below response (which I had abandoned) from my Drafts folder. FWIW:
Hugo Chavez speaks of a "new socialism" and holds up a book by Noam Chomsky.
All IMHO: the 20th century struggles were dominated by anti-colonial movements and the broader frameworks in which they were grounded (e.g: Gandhi, Raja Ram Mohan Roy), and the civil rights struggles of particular groups. They were, it seems to me, influenced and informed by a range of moral/humanist traditions and practices with a history as old as human existence. Their counterparts (in the West) are some of the very individuals listed as those Hitchens takes up cudgels with for standing in opposition to his beloved internationalism: Chomsky, Zinn, others. (interestingly not former comrades from this internationalism).
I am reaching a point where I wonder if Hitchens and his detractors (as outlined in this piece, with his detractors being identified as "the Left") are irrelevant to the future. They own the terminology and to some extent the [verbal] debate, but I have reason to hope that third world movements hold the answers of the future.
--ravi
-- Support something better than yourself ;-) PeTA => http://peta.org/ Greenpeace => http://greenpeace.org/ If you have nothing better to read: http://platosbeard.org/