its unconvincing.
and, as for anti-science, the people who commonly promote this are not uncommonly just PR agents for people who get science grants of some sort. (if creationism wins, then they get a church, while if science wins we get a conference center with wine and cheese.)
--- On Thu, 8/27/09, Somebody Somebody <philos_case at yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Somebody Somebody <philos_case at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [lbo-talk] let's argue about the cause of mental illness
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 2:53 AM
> Suicide rates in the U.S. have been
> on a slight uptick in recent years (5% over ten years ago),
> but they're still much lower than they were up until the
> 90's... when antidepressants began to be widely prescribed.
> I doubt this is a coincidence. The rise in acceptance of
> both talk therapy and prescriptions for mental illness has
> been a progressive historical development.
>
> Why leftists would oppose this is beyond me. Just as we
> demand public health care, we should be agitating for public
> mental health care. Instead, we have radicals implicitly
> finding common ground with traditionalists, obscurantists,
> and Scientologists. But, really this is just part and parcel
> of the reactionary anti-technology undercurrent of the
> contemporary left.
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>