I think Hobsbawm is not far off. He is a good historical scholar om addotopm tp javing been in the Communist Movement a long time.
In China Shakes the World, Belden tells of accompanyign a good size group of guerillas who were not even controlled by the Party but acting on their own. (Kidnapping and executing a landlorrd from a walled village guarded by a contingent of Nationalist troops.) So the PLA (1) was not made up mostly by CP members, and in addition to it there were "Regular Guerillas" (controlled by the Party but not members) and fairly substantial numbers of "Irregulars" (neither party members nor controlled by the Party).
Carrol
Marv Gandall wrote:
>
> Doug writes:
>
> > On Dec 16, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Marv Gandall wrote:
> >
> >> Armed CP fighters alone - you can't get more "active" than that -
> >> numbered in the tens of thousands in Spain and occupied Europe, and
> >> the hundreds of thousands when China and other liberation movements
> >> are included, at the peak of the Comintern's global influence
> >> between 1935-45.
> >
> > Let me say this again, since people seem to be missing it: I think
> > Hobsbawm was talking about hardcore members, professional
> > revolutionaries, cadre, whatever you want to call them - and not the
> > rank and file or the infantry or whatever.
> ===========================
> Yes, but even excluding the PLA infantry, there were almost certainly more than 20,000 CP militants who fought in Spain and in the resistance movements throughout Nazi-occupied Europe in the course of a decade. On the other hand, if Hobsbawn was alluding only to full-timers employed by the party at all levels, 20,000 is a very impressive number, and probably an exaggeration. But we'd need to see the quote...
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk