>Who says art was supposed to be "interesting"?
>
>--- On Wed, 2/4/09, wrobert at uci.edu <wrobert at uci.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > P.S. also, 'beauty' doesn't really say anything
> > all that interesting about
> > art.
> >
Nobody. He said, and I'd agree, that talking about beauty in relation to art isn't very interesting.